🔗 Share this article

The nation's bold action to prohibit social platforms access for individuals under sixteen is sparking debate worldwide. Politicians, child protection groups, and parents are observing intently to see if this strategy will become a template for other nations.

European Trend

In Europe, a rising group of nations are exploring similar bans.

• Denmark plans a ban on social media for youth below 15, with the prime minister declaring that smartphones and platforms are "stealing our youngsters' childhood". A law is expected to be enacted next year.
• Norway is planning to enforce a access barrier of 15, highlighting the need to shield children from the "influence of the AI".
• The Irish government is developing a digital wallet to confirm the identity and age of social media users. Officials have stated that an similar ban remains "a potential measures under consideration".
• In The Spanish government, the leader has called on lawmakers to approve a proposal increasing the minimum age for accessing social media to 16.
• In The French government, the leader has threatened a ban for those under fifteen, and a parliamentary commission has endorsed a similar action, potentially involving an overnight "screen time restriction" for adolescents.
• The administration in The Dutch government has recommended families to block their youngsters from social media before 15.

For the broader EU, the bloc's legislature has approved a advisory statement calling for a ban for minors except if parental consent is granted. While it highlights of the "compulsive" design of these platforms, the step does not enact mandatory rules.

"An effective age limit is a good first step," said a leading MEP driving the resolution.

Britain: A Cautious Stance

In the UK, the government has kept open a future ban, stating that "no option is being dismissed" but stressing any decision must be "supported by conclusive research".

Previously, support grew behind a proposal to impose controls on social media use by under-16s, but it was ultimately watered down. Nonetheless, the government pledged to investigate the topic.

Campaign organizations have expressed apprehensions. An organization set up by the family of a teenager who was lost after viewing dangerous online content contends that a blanket age ban could fail to protect children and could lead to a "dangerous transition" of exposure when young people become eligible.

"Australia's ban is a answer to the failure of the tech sector to create platforms and apps that are safe and age appropriate for children," stated a prominent online safety campaigner.

The United States: A Decentralized Picture

In the United States, regulation is primarily happening at the local level amid federal stalemate.

• The state of Utah demands adult approval for minors to use social media and limits overnight use.
• Florida has passed a bill barring children under fourteen from creating accounts on social media, though it faces constitutional disputes.
• Virginia has approved a rule capping teenagers to one hour of social media use per day, with extra use requiring a guardian's okay.
• Georgia, Tennessee, and Louisiana have likewise passed laws requiring parental consent for under-16s to set up social media profiles.

Even with cross-party agreement and suggestions from various individuals to copy this example, a federal ban is currently seen as a distant prospect.

International Outlook

Apart from Europe and the US, further countries are also considering moves.

• The Malaysian government aims to restrict social media for teenagers starting from next year.
• The Brazilian authorities has raised the minimum age for one major platform to 16.

However, international bodies take a more cautious stance. A major UN agency has advised that age-based restrictions have downsides and "could have unintended consequences". The body points out that online platforms can be a "lifeline" for marginalized children and that regulation should not be a "substitute" for platform operators to prioritize child safeguards.

Even as this global conversation evolves, the policies of Australia and others indicate that governments globally are no longer content to wait for platforms to make changes on their own.